Pre-evaluation

One of the preventive methods in alternative dispute resolution is ‘pre-evaluation.’ This process involves bringing together the parties in conflict and evaluating different methods to resolve the conflict in the most satisfactory way for all parties. The pre-evaluation process offers a proactive approach to dispute resolution and includes the following steps:

    on degerlendirme nedir

    Purpose and Steps of the Pre-evaluation Process

    Identification and Analysis of Problems:

    • The parties are brought together to address all dimensions of the current conflict.
    • The conflict is analyzed, and the issues are examined in depth considering the perspectives of the parties.

    Evaluation of Methods:

    • Various methods for resolving the dispute are considered according to the needs and expectations of the parties.
    • A SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis is conducted from the perspective of the parties.

    Development of Solution Alternatives:

    • Short, medium, and long-term solution alternatives are evaluated.
    • The feasibility and impacts of each alternative are discussed.

    Evaluation of Judicial Process:

    • The gains and losses that the judicial process outside of ADR would bring are examined by our team of experts.
    • These evaluations are presented to the parties in a detailed report.

    Advantages of Pre-evaluation

    Proactive Approach: It helps parties resolve issues at an early stage by preventing conflicts from deepening further.

    Comprehensive Analysis: It determines the most appropriate resolution methods by considering the needs and expectations of all parties.

    Flexibility: It provides flexibility in resolving disputes, offering faster and more effective solutions compared to the judicial process.

    Clear and Healthy Agreements: The evaluation process, conducted with the participation of all parties, ensures that agreements are clearer and healthier.

    Role of ADRIstanbul in the Pre-evaluation Process

    sAs ADRIstanbul, we provide comprehensive support to the parties during the assessment process. Our team of experts has in-depth knowledge and experience in the analysis of disputes, development of solution alternatives, and evaluation of the gains and losses of the judicial process. At the end of this process, we ensure the development of the most satisfactory and sustainable solutions for the parties.

    The evaluation method offers a proactive and systematic approach to dispute resolution. Considering all the needs of the parties, you can always reach out to us to produce effective and satisfactory solutions.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is Early Neutral Evaluation?

    Early Neutral Evaluation is a proactive method used to address conflicts. This process brings parties together to analyze the dispute comprehensively, evaluate potential resolution methods, and aim for the most satisfactory outcomes for all involved.

    How Does the Early Neutral Evaluation Process Work?

    The process typically includes the following steps:

    • Identifying and analyzing the issues
    • Evaluating resolution methods based on the needs and expectations of the parties
    • Developing alternative solutions
    • Assessing the advantages and disadvantages of pursuing litigation
    What is the Purpose of Early Neutral Evaluation?

    The goal is to resolve conflicts before they escalate, foster mutual agreement among parties, and develop resolution methods tailored to the specific needs of the situation. It focuses on achieving satisfaction and sustainability in the outcomes.

    What are the Advantages of Early Neutral Evaluation?
    • It prevents conflicts from escalating further.
    • It considers the needs and expectations of all parties.
    • It provides faster and more flexible solutions compared to litigation.
    • It fosters clear and well-defined agreements through a participatory process.
    How Do Parties Participate in the Early Neutral Evaluation Process?

    Parties actively engage throughout the process, having the opportunity to voice their needs and perspectives. This participation ensures more effective and satisfactory outcomes.

    What is the Difference Between Early Neutral Evaluation and Litigation?

    Early Neutral Evaluation is more flexible, quicker, and involves active participation from the parties. Litigation, on the other hand, is often lengthier, costlier, and leaves the resolution largely in the hands of the court.

    What Role Does ADRIstanbul Play in Early Neutral Evaluation?

    ADRIstanbul provides comprehensive support during the Early Neutral Evaluation process. Our expert team is highly skilled in analyzing disputes, developing alternative solutions, and assessing the pros and cons of litigation.

    How Long Does the Early Neutral Evaluation Process Take?

    The duration depends on the complexity of the conflict and the level of participation from the parties. However, Early Neutral Evaluation is generally faster than litigation.

    What Types of Conflicts Are Suitable for Early Neutral Evaluation?

    This method is suitable for a wide range of conflicts, including commercial disputes and family-related disagreements. Its flexibility makes it effective in various situations.